Redstate has a post up criticizing predictions of Venusian runaway warming. True, some proponents of addressing the ways we are causing the present warming trend have probably predicted Venusian runaway. It would not surprise me to find that there are folks that are ignorant of climatology on both sides of the political debate. However, in the scientific debate the risk of Venusian runaway warming is assessed as minimal. This does not mean that we are out of the woods as far as all bad effects from our impact on the climate goes, of course. On thing that particularly concerns me is the fact that changes in seasonal patterns and rainfall patterns may upset agriculture, especially in regions already susceptible to famine. It will not take Venusian runaway warming for us to have those kinds of impacts. I was going to slam Redstate in this post, but this comment and fact that the post's author felt compelled to say "I am not a 100% skeptic of global warming - nor of the possibility of human influence" shows that even on a far-right site like Redstate their are folks that understand climatology well enough that outright denial is not the default position.

Recent Comments